Contact us anytime to know more — Amit A., Founder & COO CISIN
Already, automation has exceeded human imagination in terms of what it is possible to accomplish and how. Automation aids in the development of software and equipment that can operate accurately, error-free, and around the clock.
For a very long time, process automation has developed into an industry hero. Automation has improved profitability, decreased risk, increased efficiency, maintained compliance, and saved time.
We stand atop the towers of the industrial revolutions that have brought the world to our fingertips in these modern times.
The automation sector greatly sped up and simplified processes. Companies are also trying to switch from manual to automated business processes in their operations. Businesses can accomplish that by using automation technologies.
What then are traditional automation and robotic process automation? What distinguishes these two from one another? What notable distinctions might there be? In this blog post, we'll examine this.
Traditional Automation: What Is It?
Conventional automation was primarily designed to integrate user applications with backend systems of organizations so that the latter could carry out predefined backend tasks with minimal independent human intervention.
It combines outdated technologies with various programming and APIs that integrate with various systems.
Traditional automation made its way into the service sector, specializing in workflow automation and customer service applications.
Developers must be familiar with and comprehend the target systems, and users must be aware that programming abilities are required to operate them. This is the primary distinction between robotic process automation and traditional automation.
Robotic Process Automation: What Is It?
It's a technology that makes software robots capable of performing mundane, repetitive tasks. It combines user interface (UI) interactions, integrates with APIs, and completes repetitive tasks between productivity and enterprise applications.RPA tools accomplish the autonomous execution of different transactions and activities across unrelated software systems by deploying software robots, which mimic human processes.
It is a particular kind of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI)-based software automation technology (ML).
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) benefits and implementation aids in the creation of software bots that complete routine tasks fast, on their own, and without human assistance.
Traditional Automation vs. robotic Process Automation
Both automation technologies are employed to decrease manual intervention and enhance the quality of results. However, RPA and traditional automation are not the same.
You can use it to program a machine to perform any function at any stage of the workflow. However, it's a kind of automation that stays on the front end of your system, completing tasks without requiring you to switch to the back end.
There are a few significant variations between the two automations, even though they are both utilized for software integration to automate business processes.
Technology Difference
In the comparison of traditional automation and RPA in integration, RPA primarily employs software bots to interpret user activity at the UI level and can also utilize APIs for integrating various applications.
In contrast, Traditional Automation relies heavily on APIs and additional integration methods. Developers working with traditional automation need a deep understanding of user experience and behavior and must strictly follow project creation protocols to develop bots.
This comprehensive knowledge of the target system underscores the practicality of traditional automation in terms of both usage and technological foundation when compared to RPA.
Software Limitations
It has numerous drawbacks, such as limitations in various applications because of missing software source code and restricted APIs, which make integrating various systems challenging.
Put differently, traditional automation is difficult and necessitates in-depth software knowledge. However, since RPA typically works with a user interface (UI), the aforementioned limitations are unnecessary.
Integration With Other Systems Is Simple
As was already mentioned, RPA integrates seamlessly with current infrastructure or systems. To move to RPA, your company's current IT infrastructure does not need to be altered in any way.
RPA bots improve the speed and efficiency of your current systems by running on top of them.
RPA bots can be used with various systems, including legacy, API, no-API, and so forth if your processes and updates involve different IT environments.
RPA is better than traditional automation in this regard. The latter is an outdated technology that uses APIs for integration and frequently necessitates modifications to the current IT infrastructure.
Implementation Time
RPA is by far not the simpler and faster method of implementing automation. It is not necessary for RPA to integrate with every application to be implemented into your current systems because it makes use of graphical user interfaces.
What does this signify? You won't have to worry about integrating the RPA bot into the financial software or HR management tools, for instance, if you intend to use it to sort through payroll data and streamline the payroll function in your company. Without requiring any kind of integration procedure, the RPA bots are able to extract data from word processing and spreadsheets with ease.
The RPA software's ability to be process-driven, which means it only worries about the task at hand, is also beneficial.
Tasks can include anything from standard chats and text interpretation to file movement, extraction, copying, data insertion, updating, routine analyses, and reporting.However, the implementation of traditional automation frequently takes months. Because it depends on APIs for integration, tasks like feasibility studies and test design take a lot longer. A primary benefit of RPA is its increased speed to market.
Ease Of Scalability
For the same reasons that are discussed in the first two points, scaling traditional automation in your business takes a lot of time and work.
Scaling up RPA is as simple a process as putting it into practice. You can change up your resources based on what's needed at any given moment. Software that is both scalable and ready for an enterprise is RPA.
The majority of businesses begin automating one task at a time. Take a bank as an example. They may begin by automating a back-office function, such as processing a transaction. After they are successful, they plan to implement RPA bots to handle additional back-office tasks.
Before long, the majority of the bank's business operations will be automated.
Customization
Customization in RPA deployment provides a high degree of flexibility for tailoring your business operational efficiency.
Consider this: your staff members have particular needs regarding, say, the calendar feature. They must add specific events and send invitations for the same. With the help of RPA, they can build bots that can carry out these jobs and synchronize the results with other programs, such as email, CRM, and enterprise resource planning (ERP), to keep everyone in the loop.
On the other hand, you will have to deal with the limitations of APIs when developing new functionality under the traditional automation tool, which will make it more difficult to configure updates or changes.
When compared to RPA, traditional programming can seem overwhelming.
Human Imitation
With traditional automation systems, the predefined instructions are executed by the system after programmatic information is fed into it.
However, with RPA, the task is carried out by bots that mimic human employee behavior. We can effectively train our system to perform routine tasks as humans would by using RPA to automate them.
Cost Efficiency
The implementation of any new technology entails significant costs. The question we should be asking ourselves is whether the benefits the technology provides to the company outweigh the cost, if at all.
The efficiency and cost-effectiveness of RPA vs traditional automation come into play when considering initial costs.
While RPA may initially appear costlier than traditional automation, the long-term benefits, such as redirecting human resources, often outweigh these upfront expenses. Conversely, due to its complex integration, traditional automation tends to incur higher maintenance cost savings over time.
Accuracy
Because bots are accurate and produce higher-quality output, the idea of using them to automate processes is alluring.
The possibility of human error influencing the task execution is eliminated, which is a risk associated with traditional automation. RPA bots are consistently reliable and compliant. This is a strong argument in support of RPA automation.
Programming Skills As A Prerequisite
Nobody enjoys being informed that they need advanced programming abilities in order to use a particular technology.
None at all. This issue is resolved by RPA since RPA bots can be used without any prior programming language knowledge. RPA-driven automation is as easy to understand as a flowchart.
Simply concentrating on the critical task at hand programming language or scripts is not necessary.Naturally, integrating RPA bots into workflows will be simpler and easier for employees. Programming language proficiency is necessary to use traditional automation tools, and the kind of proficiency required will vary depending on the automation tool type.
For instance, a person writing automation codes in JavaScript might not be able to synchronize with a manual task that is automated in, say, Python.
Not every member of the workforce can learn every programming language. The usefulness of the conventional automation tools is thereby diminished. RPA's low- or no-code solutions are ideal for today's workplaces.
Physical Machines
Traditional automation may sometimes call for physical machines to complete complex tasks simultaneously or in parallel.
RPA allows you to avoid physical technology by assigning work to hundreds of virtual bots that complete mundane tasks through RPA technology in virtual space.
Conclusion
Both traditional and robotic process automation have their uses and are currently operating profitably in various organizations, sectors, and enterprises.
Both methods offer unique benefits regardless of the task nature and desired company results automation should always be applied when possible. There is a difference between robotic process automation and traditional automation. The technology options for each solution are entirely different, even though they can be used in some similar edge scenarios.
Robotic process automation presents a viable substitute for traditional automation in cases where procedures are straightforward, requiring only Yes/No choices and judgments devoid of any kind of judgment.
One example is the automatic comparison of data across multiple ERP displays, including the screens for purchase orders and invoice processing. RPA requires quick action by quickly capturing screen content and performing tasks identical to what is completed by people.
Consequently, it tends to be slower and error-prone compared with fully integrated automated solutions or solutions that use APIs.
